Road Map for SNIC investments and Services

Forum Discussion II

SNIC User Forum, Dec. 16 2014

“I've told you once.
No you haven't!
Yes I have.
When?
Just now.
No you didn't!
Yes I did!
You didn't!
I did!
You didn't!
I'm telling you, I did!
You did not!
Oh I'm sorry, is this a five minute argument, or the full half hour?”

*From the Monty Python argument sketch

The task for SNIC

The responsibilities of SNIC should start somewhere and end somewhere, the question is where these start and endpoints lie.

SNIC should service and help all research that requires compute and/or storage resources

Or

SNIC should only focus on servicing research that requires large scale HPC and associated storage resources

Predominant user job sizes and the frequency with which they are run

missing

Predominant user job sizes and their typical walltime

missing

SNIC compute resources

SNIC should provide more compute capacity

Respondent preferred focus areas for SNIC in the coming years

missing

SNIC compute resources

SNIC should have fewer and larger national resources
Is geographical proximity important Ratio
Yes 14%
No 86%

The most beneficial future evolution of SNIC compute resources according to survey respondents

missing

Respondent votes on which future evolution of SNIC computing resources would benefit them the most

missing

SNIC compute resources

SNIC should not impose job size requirements on any compute resource

Predominant user job sizes and the frequency with which they are run

missing

SNIC compute resources

All SNIC compute resources should accept jobs with a run time of 3 days

Predominant user job sizes and their typical walltime

missing

SNIC compute resources

SNIC should harmonize login procedure, job submission procedure, job scheduling behaviour, and software availability

Respondent perceived benefit of increased commonalities between SNIC centres

missing

SNIC storage resources

SNIC should provide services for long−term storage of research data

The data services respondents wanted SNIC to provide

missing

SNIC storage resources

SNIC should invest in improving the interfaces to SweStore

Respondent rating of the different interfaces to SweStore. The percentage figures refer to the total number of respondents

missing

SNIC support services

SNIC centres provide good support and documentation

How do you rate the e-mail based support that is provided by SNIC?

Satisfaction level Ratio
Poor 0%
Less than satisfactory 1%
Satisfactory 30%
More than satisfactory 30%
Excellent 31%
No opinion 9%

SNIC support services

Support doesn't scale well. How should SNIC cope with getting more users?

SNIC support services

Other infrastructures that use SNIC resources must handle end-user support for their community

SNIC support services

More funding must be allocated for handling all kinds of support activities

SNIC support services

SNIC application experts should focus on operational services regarding development environments and associated training

Respondent preferred application expert focus areas

missing

SNIC resource allocations

SNIC should provide resource allocations that run for longer than 12 months

Access for medium-size or large-size computing allocations is for 6 or 12 month periods. Does this match your research projects?

Matches projects Ratio
Yes 40%
No, I would prefer to have allocations with longer duration 41%
No answer/ Not applicable 17%
Other 2%

SNIC resource allocations

Large SNAC allocations should be integrated with VR grants

Lunch

Thank you for participating!